GOOD Statement by Suzette Little
GOOD Deputy Secretary-General & City of Cape Town Councillor
4 December 2025
The City of Cape Town is preparing to adopt its new Long-Term Planning Framework (LTPF), a document meant to steer the future of a metro of more than five million residents. Yet this 25-year vision is being advanced based on only 40 public submissions. For a plan of this scale, such limited participation is not democratic consultation – it is a procedural failure.
The City has not released ward-level participation data, demographic information, or a complete register of submissions. There is no indication that the voices of Cape Flats communities, informal settlements, backyard residents, young people, or working-class households were heard. A long-term framework that shapes Cape Town until 2050 cannot be credible if most of its residents played no part in its development.
A central pillar of the LTPF is the promise of “50,000 housing opportunities per year by 2050.” This figure collapses under scrutiny. “Opportunities” usually refer to serviced sites with no top structures, mixed-use developments unaffordable to most Capetonians, or land transferred to private developers without protections against displacement. This is not meaningful housing delivery – it is a statistical sleight of hand.
Meanwhile, more than 400,000 people remain on the housing waiting list. Backyard dwellings continue to multiply, and overcrowding is worsening. Instead of accelerating the construction of brick-and-mortar homes, the City inflates its delivery numbers by counting serviced sites as successes.
Expanding bare plots on the Cape Flats without funded structures, densification safeguards, or anti-displacement measures will entrench overcrowding, deepen poverty, and cement ghettoised conditions for decades.
Experts and civic organisations raised critical concerns about the LTPF, including compliance with the Spatial Planning and Land Use Management Act (SPLUMA), the Municipal Finance Management Act (MFMA), the Promotion of Administrative Justice Act (PAJA), tenure security, public land alienation, and displacement linked to densification. The City’s responses were vague and repeatedly deferred crucial details to future frameworks. Legal compliance and community protection cannot be postponed.
Although the plan acknowledges poverty, violence, and inequality, it shifts responsibility to national partnerships, policy reforms, and distant long-term objectives. But families on the Cape Flats face daily hardship now – funerals, collapsing transport systems, and overcrowded living conditions. A long-term plan must support urgent local action, not replace it. Communities cannot wait until 2050.
For credibility, the City must:
1. Release the full submissions register for transparency.
2. Provide ward-by-ward and demographic participation data.
3. Clarify whether “50,000 opportunities” refers to completed homes.
4. Detail anti-displacement protections linked to densification.
5. Present a funded, lawful housing pipeline using well-located public land.
At present, the plan meets none of these benchmarks. Cape Town cannot claim to be “the best-run city” while excluding most of its residents from decisions about their future. A metro of this size cannot be shaped by 40 voices. It deserves an honest, inclusive, and credible long-term plan – built with its people, not despite them.
Media Enquiries: media@forgood.org.za